FORMS AND LEVELS OF COLLABORATION BETWEEN ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS AND AGRO-INDUSTRIAL FIRMS IN ONDO STATE, NIGERIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51459/jostir.2026.2.1.0218Keywords:
collaboration, academic institutions, agro-industrial firmsAbstract
This study examined the forms and levels of collaboration between academic institutions and agro-industrial firms in Ondo State, Nigeria. A multistage sampling technique was used to select 180 respondents comprising academics, agro-industrial firms, and relevant government agencies. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and key informant interviews and analysed using frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, and figures. Results show that collaboration is predominantly training-oriented rather than research-driven. From the academic perspective, the Student Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) was the most prevalent form of collaboration (100.0%), co-hosting of workshops (58.3%), consultancy services (50.0%), and formal Memoranda of Understanding (50.0%). Similarly, agro-industrial firms reported internships and SIWES placements as the dominant engagement (80.0%). The level of collaboration was generally weak, as interaction frequency was very low (x̄ = 1.17), despite high commitment from both academia and industry (x̄ = 2.92). Academia played a strong role in providing research-driven solutions, particularly in improving productivity, value-chain development, technical expertise, and technology adoption (x̄ = 3.50). Meanwhile, collaboration was significantly constrained by climate change impacts (x̄ = 3.42), market volatility (x̄ = 3.25), and low research commercialisation (x̄ = 3.00). Agro-industrial firms expressed strong demand for applied research support, especially expert technical advice (90.0%), skills gap analysis (90.0%), and problem-oriented studies addressing production and processing challenges (89.0%). Based on these findings, the study recommends that academic institutions and agro-industrial firms should transition from predominantly training-based interactions to structured, problem-oriented research collaboration by jointly designing applied research agendas that directly address identified industry challenges.
References
Akinbobola, B. O., & Akinnagbe, O. M. (2021). Strengthening university–industry linkages for agricultural innovation and development in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 25(3), 1–12.
Akinbobola, T. P., & Akinnagbe, O. M. (2023). Determinants of linkages between agricultural institutions and agro-allied industries in Southwest Nigeria. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(1), 228–248.
Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The Triple Helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2019). Climate-smart agriculture: Sourcebook. FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). The state of food and agriculture: Leveraging automation in agriculture. FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). Climate-smart agriculture and agro-industrial development. FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). Climate-smart agriculture and agro-industrial development. FAO.
Hall, A., Dijkman, J., & Sulaiman, R. (2017). Research into use: Investigating the relationship between agricultural research and innovation (ILRI Working Paper). International Livestock Research Institute.
Hall, A., Dijkman, J., & Sulaiman, R. (2017). Research into use: Investigating the relationship between agricultural research and innovation. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
Hall, A., Sulaiman, R., Clark, N., & Yoganand, B. (2014). From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: An innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural Systems, 78(2), 213–241.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability (Sixth Assessment Report, Working Group II). Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Sixth assessment report: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC.
International Labour Organization. (2023). Skills for a greener future: Workforce development in agro-industry. ILO.
International Labour Organization. (2023). Skills for a greener future: Workforce development in agro-industry. ILO Publishing.
Klerkx, L., Begemann, S., & Wesseler, J. (2023). Innovation systems and agricultural transformation: Current debates and future directions. Agricultural Systems, 203, 103520.
Kochetkov, D. (2023). Innovation and invention dynamics in economic development. Springer.
Kumar, S., & Prakash, A. (2019). Strengthening agricultural innovation systems in emerging economies: Lessons from Brazil and India. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 32(2), 215–227.
Muscio, A., & Vallanti, G. (2014). Perceived obstacles to university–industry collaboration: Results from a qualitative survey of Italian academic departments. Industry and Innovation, 21(6), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.969037
Oni, O. A., Adepoju, A. A., & Adeoye, I. B. (2019). University–industry linkages and agricultural innovation in Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 11(4), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2018.1551736
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Rebuilding agricultural markets for resilience. OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Rebuilding agricultural markets for resilience. OECD Publishing.
Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2022). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2021. Research Policy, 51(1), 104408.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., d’Este, P., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
World Bank. (2017). Agribusiness indicators: Nigeria. World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2022). Transforming research into innovation: Commercialization pathways in developing economies. World Bank.
World Bank. (2023). Enabling the business of agriculture. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.